
.png)
Nick Cottee
Founder, Zilla
.png)
Subscribe for email updates
We help streamline your funnel, boost conversions, and unlock more revenue.
.png)
Most people start with ActiveCampaign the same way: build a few automations, send some emails, and see what happens. For a while, it works. Then, a year later, nobody knows which automation does what, half the tags are outdated, and adding a new workflow feels like pulling a thread that might unravel the whole system.
That’s when it’s time to think in terms of architecture — not just automations.
For another take on this, check out our article on SOLID principles.

When every new campaign means creating another list or tag, your system slowly becomes unmanageable. Contacts end up with overlapping tags, multiple deal records, and conflicting automations. You start to get leads who receive two welcome sequences or customers who get pitched offers they already bought.
This usually happens because the account grew without a plan. Automation architecture fixes that by giving your system structure, rules, and naming conventions before you keep scaling.
Start with something simple: a consistent naming system.
Every automation, list, tag, and custom field should follow a predictable pattern. For example:
This might seem unnecessary when you only have a few automations, but once you have dozens, it’s the difference between clarity and chaos.
Create a short internal “naming guide” and store it somewhere the team can find easily. Anytime you add a new automation, tag, or list, check the guide first. It takes a few extra seconds and saves hours later.
Many accounts have one massive automation that tries to do everything — lead capture, nurture, deal creation, upsell, follow-up. When something breaks, you have to dig through a hundred steps to find the issue.
A better approach is modular design: smaller automations that handle one clear purpose.
Examples:
Each module connects through triggers like tags, deals, or custom fields. It’s easier to monitor and much simpler to scale.
If you’ve ever wondered why an automation fired unexpectedly, it’s usually because of messy triggers.
Avoid triggers that rely on vague actions like “when a tag is added” unless that tag’s meaning is well-documented. Instead, use specific, intentional triggers tied to lifecycle stages or form submissions.
For example:
This level of clarity stops automation overlap and reduces the chance of misfires.
Tags are great for identifying actions, but too many can bury meaning. Instead of tagging everything, use custom fields to hold lasting information (like product interest or subscription level).
Tags should represent short-term signals — things like “Requested Demo,” “Downloaded Guide,” or “Needs Follow-up.” Custom fields handle data you want to track over time.
Keeping that separation clean makes it much easier to build accurate conditions later. For Activecampaign users, don't miss our article on tagging like a pro.

Nobody wants to do it, but documenting your automations pays off faster than almost anything else. A simple spreadsheet or Notion page with:
When someone new joins your team or you revisit the system six months later, you’ll actually understand what’s happening.
Automations age quickly. Products change, offers evolve, and small tweaks accumulate over time. Schedule a review at least every six months. Disable or archive anything that’s outdated, and test the core flows from start to finish.
The more you grow, the more important it is to keep your system light and intentional.
If your account has dozens of automations and nobody’s quite sure how they interact, it’s time for an audit.
At Zilla, we rebuild ActiveCampaign accounts every week for businesses that hit this exact wall. We fix broken data paths, clean up automations, and design architecture that’s easy to scale.
Once that foundation is in place, everything else — reporting, personalization, even AI tools — becomes simpler.